Lyell Collection

Quarterly Journal of Engineering Geology and Hydrogeology

Lyell Centre  |   Lyell Collection  |   Subscriptions   |   Geological Society  |   Email alerts  |   Online bookshop  |   Help


Keywords:
Author:
Advanced search>>
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow References
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Related articles in Quarterly Journal of Engineering Geology and Hydrogeology
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Request Permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Robinson, D.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
Quarterly Journal of Engineering Geology and Hydrogeology; 1981; v. 14; issue.1; p. 75;
DOI: 10.1144/GSL.QJEG.1981.014.01.06
© 1981 Geological Society of London

Discussion

Discussion on ‘Geotechnical, mineralogical and chemical interrelationships in weathering profiles of an over-consolidated clay’ by D. J. Russell and A. Parker

D. Robinson

University of Bristol, Department of Geology, , Queen's Building, University Walk, Bristol BS8 1TR.

D. Robinson writes: The authors have clearly demonstrated in their Fig. 3a the change in shape of the illite basal 10 Å reflection with depth in a weathering profile of the Oxford Clay. They attributed this change to a decrease in crystallinity caused by weathering which results in a progressive loss of interlayer potassium and leads to an increased shoulder on the low 2{theta} side of the 10 Å peak. Quantification of the shape factor, as the authors suggest, has been widely attempted in clay mineral studies. In the examples quoted (Gill et al. 1977; Weaver 1960) the ratio of the peak-minus-background intensity at 10 Å to that at 10.5 Å is utilized in the examination of crystallinity changes through diagenesis into low-grade metamorphism. This ratio therefore is a measure of the similarity to an ideal 10 Å peak rather than reflecting the importance of the 11 Å d-spacing as in the shape-factor chosen by the authors.

The changes demonstrated in peak-shape, however, could also be caused by the presence of varying proportions of random mixed-layer components in the illite (Thorez 1975). The authors will be aware that there are various pretreatment methods that allow the recognition and semi-quantification of interlayer components (Hower & Mowatt 1966; Weaver 1956). It may be that the various geotechnical parameters could be better understood if there is a varying proportion of interlayer component in the illite, especially if it is of a swelling character.

It is obvious that the authors have many more data

...

This 250-word extract was created in the absence of an abstract.


Related articles in Quarterly Journal of Engineering Geology and Hydrogeology:

Geotechnical, mineralogical and chemical interrelationships in weathering profiles of an overconsolidated clay
D. J. Russell and A. Parker
Quarterly Journal of Engineering Geology and Hydrogeology 1979 12: 107-116. [Abstract]