Lyell Collection

Quarterly Journal of Engineering Geology and Hydrogeology

Lyell Centre  |   Lyell Collection  |   Subscriptions   |   Geological Society  |   Email alerts  |   Online bookshop  |   Help


Keywords:
Author:
Advanced search>>
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Related articles in Quarterly Journal of Engineering Geology and Hydrogeology
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Request Permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Douglas, T. H.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
Quarterly Journal of Engineering Geology and Hydrogeology; 1984; v. 17; issue.2; p. 165;
DOI: 10.1144/GSL.QJEG.1984.017.02.10
© 1984 Geological Society of London

Discussion

Discussion on ‘Comparisons between real and predicted geology in tunnels: examples from recent cases’ by G. West

T. H. Douglas

James Williamson & Partners, 231 St Vincent Street, Glasgow G2 5QZ.

T. H. DOUGLAS writes: Graham West has provided a useful summary of data obtained from the case studies he has used to illustrate the effectiveness of site investigations for tunnels. However, due no doubt to the limited space allocated within the text of a single paper, there are a number of further comments which should be noted in relation to the comparison between predicted and actual geology of the Diversion Tunnel at Dinorwic.

Construction of the Diversion Tunnel started in November 1975 and was completed in July 1978. Taking into account the final cost and comparing the site investigation costs, updated to the same base date, indicates a figure of 1.4 for the site investigation as a percentage of the capital cost of these work. The figure includes for the special investigations associated with the old copper workings and the cost of additional precautions while tunnelling advanced through the critical zone.

Reference is included in the text to a comparison between predicted and actual lithology—this is shown on fig. 6 and listed in table 3. While the different lithologies were of some interest and the variation in hardness had a slight effect on rates of drilling, the principal influence on rate of advance was the amount of lining required. While a comparison between the amount included in the Bill of Quantities (651 lin. m) to that installed (455 lin. m) may be of interest a further comparison is shown in the Table 1.

It should be noted that the basis

...

This 250-word extract was created in the absence of an abstract.


Related articles in Quarterly Journal of Engineering Geology and Hydrogeology:

Comparisons between real and predicted geology in tunnels: examples from recent cases
Graham West
Quarterly Journal of Engineering Geology and Hydrogeology 1983 16: 113-126. [Abstract]