Lyell Collection

Quarterly Journal of Engineering Geology and Hydrogeology

Lyell Centre  |   Lyell Collection  |   Subscriptions   |   Geological Society  |   Email alerts  |   Online bookshop  |   Help


Keywords:
Author:
Advanced search>>
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow References
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Request Permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Barton, M. E.
Right arrow Articles by Roche, M. H.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
GeoRef
Right arrow GeoRef Citation
Quarterly Journal of Engineering Geology and Hydrogeology; 1984; v. 17; issue.4; p. 307-318;
DOI: 10.1144/GSL.QJEG.1984.017.04.04
© 1984 Geological Society of London

Article

A geological appraisal of the site of the foundation failure of the giant oil tanks at Fawley, Hampshire

M. E. Barton & M. H. Roche

Department of Civil Engineering, University of Southampton, , Hampshire SO9 5NH

Two giant oil tanks (79.3 m diameter by 19.5 m high) were constructed at Fawley in 1967-68. The tanks were founded on a reinforced concrete slab supported by piles of varying lengths taken through alluvium and end-bearing in Valley Gravel which overlies Barton Clay (Eocene). Totals of 1580 and 1652 piles, respectively, were used for each tank. The foundations failed during water-loading tests with a maximum depression of 0.425 m in one of the reinforced concrete slabs. Post-mortem examination of the foundations revealed defects in a number of piles, and after further tests and investigations, Professor G. A. Leonards concluded that the failure was due to defective piles.

The success of the original design was critically dependent on the geology. Particular problems on which attention was focussed included the continuity and thickness of the gravels, their variation in density, the character of the interface between Valley Gravel and Barton Clay and the lithological variations within the alluvium. These problems are examined here in relation to the existing geological knowledge of the region. Of particular significance is the conclusion that, in part, the variation in density within the gravels is due to the existence of Flandrian gravel overlying Pleistocene terrace gravel. Isopachytes of the gravels have been drawn along with contours on the upper and lower surfaces. These are compared with the settlement contours of the failed foundation slab and it is concluded that there is no correlation between them.




This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Geological Society, London, Special PublicationsHome page
A. J. Long, R. G. Scaife, and R. J. Edwards
Stratigraphic architecture, relative sea-level, and models of estuary development in southern England: new data from Southampton Water
Geological Society, London, Special Publications, 2000; 175: 253 - 279.
[Abstract] [PDF]