Lyell Collection
Quarterly Journal of Engineering Geology and Hydrogeology
Lyell Centre  |   Lyell Collection  |   Subscriptions   |   Geological Society  |   Email alerts  |   Online bookshop  |   Help

Keywords:
Author:
Advanced search>>
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow References
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Related articles in Quarterly Journal of Engineering Geology and Hydrogeology
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Request Permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Hobbs, N. B.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
GeoRef
Right arrow GeoRef Citation
Quarterly Journal of Engineering Geology and Hydrogeology; 1986; v. 19; issue.1; p. 7-80;
DOI: 10.1144/GSL.QJEG.1986.019.01.02
© 1986 Geological Society of London

Article

Mire morphology and the properties and behaviour of some British and foreign peats

N. B. Hobbs

Soil Mechanics Ltd, Foundation House, Eastern Road, Bracknell, Berkshire RG12 2U2

The morphology, succession and flora of British mires is briefly outlined and the influence of these factors on the index and mechanical properties of the associated peat is discussed.

Peat, in view of its exceptionally high water content, is an extraordinary material, yet in many respects it may be regarded as ordinary in as much as the correlations between its various properties and behavioural parameters are little different from those of clay soils except in regard to strength. The cation exchange ability of peat is extremely high and exerts an important influence on its properties. The properties and parameters of some UK bog and fen peats are compared with peats from Canada and other countries.

It is shown that under constrained deformation the so-called secondary compression is the dominant and fundamental process; the consolidation phase is properly regarded as but a temporary aberration. It follows from this that the so-called preconsolidation pressure is a function of the test procedure and thickness of the peat, sample or layer. A fundamental preconsolidation pressure, both time and load induced, does exist but its determination is difficult. Current testing procedures are examined and the errors involved in conventional methods of predicting settlements are explored and evaluated.

The shear strength of peat and the stability of works over mires are not discussed.


Related articles in Quarterly Journal of Engineering Geology and Hydrogeology:

Discussion on ‘Mire morphology and the properties and behaviour of some British and foreign peats’ by N. B. Hobbs
A. L. Burwash and W. R. Weisner
Quarterly Journal of Engineering Geology and Hydrogeology 1987 20: 97. [Abstract]  



This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
 Quarterly Journal of Engineering Geology and HydrogeologyHome page
L.J. Donnelly
Subsidence and associated ground movements on the Pennines, northern England
Quarterly Journal of Engineering Geology and Hydrogeology, 2008; 41: 315 - 332.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

Home page
 Quarterly Journal of Engineering Geology and HydrogeologyHome page
N. Boylan, P. Jennings, and M. Long
Peat slope failure in Ireland
Quarterly Journal of Engineering Geology and Hydrogeology, 2008; 41: 93 - 108.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

Home page
 Quarterly Journal of Engineering Geology and HydrogeologyHome page
D. Nichol, G.K. Doherty, and M.J. Scott
A5 Llyn Ogwen peatslide, Capel Curig, North Wales
Quarterly Journal of Engineering Geology and Hydrogeology, 2007; 40: 293 - 299.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

Home page
 Progress in Physical GeographyHome page
J. Holden, P. J. Chapman, and J. C. Labadz
Artificial drainage of peatlands: hydrological and hydrochemical process and wetland restoration
Progress in Physical Geography, 2004; 28: 95 - 123.
[Abstract] [PDF]

Home page
 Geological Society, London, Special PublicationsHome page
P. J. Fenning and L. J. Donnelly
Geophysical techniques for forensic investigation
Geological Society, London, Special Publications, 2004; 232: 11 - 20.
[Abstract] [PDF]

Home page
 Geological Society, London, Special PublicationsHome page
M. A. Lewis, A. Lilly, and J. S. Bell
Groundwater vulnerability mapping in Scotland: modifications to classification used in England and Wales
Geological Society, London, Special Publications, 2000; 182: 71 - 79.
[Abstract] [PDF]

Home page
 Geological Society, London, Special PublicationsHome page
J. R. L. Allen
Holocene coastal lowlands in NW Europe: autocompaction and the uncertain ground
Geological Society, London, Special Publications, 2000; 175: 239 - 252.
[Abstract] [PDF]

Home page
 Geological Society, London, Engineering Geology Special PublicationsHome page
F.G. Bell, J. C. Cripps, and M. G. Culshaw
The significance of engineering geology to construction
Geological Society, London, Engineering Geology Special Publications, 1995; 10: 3 - 29.
[Abstract] [PDF]

Home page
 Geological Society, London, Special PublicationsHome page
R. S. Clymo
Rainwater-fed peat as a precursor of coal
Geological Society, London, Special Publications, 1987; 32: 17 - 23.
[Abstract] [PDF]