Lyell Collection

Quarterly Journal of Engineering Geology and Hydrogeology

Lyell Centre  |   Lyell Collection  |   Subscriptions   |   Geological Society  |   Email alerts  |   Online bookshop  |   Help


Keywords:
Author:
Advanced search>>
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow References
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Request Permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Locat, J.
Right arrow Articles by Lefebvre, G.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
GeoRef
Right arrow GeoRef Citation
Quarterly Journal of Engineering Geology and Hydrogeology; 1986; v. 19; issue.4; p. 365-374;
DOI: 10.1144/GSL.QJEG.1986.19.04.03
© 1986 Geological Society of London

Article

The origin of structuration of the Grande-Baleine marine sediments, Québec, Canada

J. Locat1 & G. Lefebvre2

1 Groupe de Géologie de l'lngénieur, Département de Géologie, Université Laval, St-Foy, P.Q., Canada, G1K 7P4;
2 Département de Génie Civil, Université de Sherbrooke, P.Q., Canada, J1K 2R1

Sediments of the Grande-Baleine River were deposited in a brackish sea about 7000 years ago; the salinity was not less than 8 g/1. This fine-grained sediment was uplifted more than 150 m above sea level. The soil is extremely sensitive (St > 200 as measured by the fall cone), the liquidity index is often above 2. In the odeometer, this sediment is highly compressible and presents an overconsolidation ratio greater than 2 and this with signs of little erosion. Research work has yielded a behavioural model that includes different processes such as early cementation during or soon after deposition and leaching to the actual porewater salinity of 0.5 g/1. Both processes have resulted in a sediment with abnormally high water content (with respect to effective stress) and a high liquidity index, due in part to leaching. Field and laboratory work demonstrate that for this soil, processes responsible for its structuration are leaching and cementation (or anything that has prevented the soil from consolidating completely). No evidence could be found that would suggest the action of delayed consolidation. Today this soil appears geologically normally consolidated (i.e. there is no erosion or surcharge), mechanically overconsolidated (O.C.R. >2), and physico-chemically underconsolidated (abnormally high water content).