Lyell Collection

Quarterly Journal of Engineering Geology and Hydrogeology

Lyell Centre  |   Lyell Collection  |   Subscriptions   |   Geological Society  |   Email alerts  |   Online bookshop  |   Help


Keywords:
Author:
Advanced search>>
This Article
Right arrow Figures Only
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Request Permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Web of Science (2)
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Ciotoli, G.
Right arrow Articles by Grainger, P.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
GeoRef
Right arrow GeoRef Citation
Quarterly Journal of Engineering Geology and Hydrogeology; 2005; v. 38; issue.3; p. 305-320;
DOI: 10.1144/1470-9236/03-058
© 2005 Geological Society of London

Original Article

Migration of gas injected into a fault in low-permeability ground

G. Ciotoli1, G. Etiope2, M. Guerra3, S. Lombardi1, G.A. Duddridge4 & P. Grainger4

1 1Dipartimento di Scienze della Terra, Università di Roma ''La Sapienza'', Piazzale A. Moro 5, 00185 Roma, Italy
2 2Instituto Nazionale di Geofisica e Vulcanologia, Via di Vigna Murata 605, 00143 Roma, Italy
3 3Agenzia per la Protezione dell'Ambiente e per i Servizi Tecnici, Via V. Brancati 48, 00144 Roma, Italy
4 4School of Engineering, Computer Science and Mathematics, University of Exeter, North Park Road, Exeter, EX4 4QF, UK

Two shallow gas-injection tests were carried out in a minor fault within the Siena Graben, Italy. Helium and carbon dioxide were injected 20 m below the ground surface through an inclined borehole intercepting the fault plane, into a sandy aquifer overlain by a clay formation. The gas-injection pressure was above hydrostatic plus capillary pressure, but below lithostatic pressure. Soil-gas, soil-exhalation flux and groundwater analyses were carried out to monitor gas breakthrough and behaviour. The experiment simulated gas rising naturally up a fault, where most of the geological boundary conditions were known. Despite its very low permeability to groundwater flow, the clay formation did not act as a complete barrier to gas rising via the fault. The gas velocity and migration pattern (namely gas channelling along the fault) were consistent with theoretical models of the migration of gas columns and gas slugs. Gas–water partitioning and the evolution of soil-gas and groundwater anomalies clearly reflected the conservative behaviour of He and the partial dissolution of CO2 into the aquifer. A general model of gas migration and behaviour is suggested which may have implications in natural resource exploration, geological storage of toxic or nuclear waste, and tectonic studies.

Key Words: fault • gas • helium • migration