Lyell Collection

Quarterly Journal of Engineering Geology and Hydrogeology

Lyell Centre  |   Lyell Collection  |   Subscriptions   |   Geological Society  |   Email alerts  |   Online bookshop  |   Help


Keywords:
Author:
Advanced search>>
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow References
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Request Permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Audric, T.
Right arrow Articles by Bouquier, L.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
GeoRef
Right arrow GeoRef Citation
Quarterly Journal of Engineering Geology and Hydrogeology; 1976; v. 9; issue.3; p. 265-277;
DOI: 10.1144/GSL.QJEG.1976.009.03.08
© 1976 Geological Society of London

Article

Collapsing behaviour of some loess soils from Normandy

T. Audric & L. Bouquier

Centre de Geologie de L'Ingenieur , 60 Boulevard Saint-Michel, 75272 Paris, France

The susceptibility to collapse of loess soils from Normandy was examined in the triaxal apparatus both at natural moisture content (UU test), and after saturation (CU test). In order to prevent the sample from collapsing before the CU test, the lateral stress was applied before the samples were saturated.

Saturated loess soils show two very different types of behaviour depending on the void ratio. At high void ratios the stress path shows a collapsing structure which does not occur at low void ratios. The behaviour at natural unsaturated moisture content seems to depend on the clay content.

After a comparison with some results obtained on loess soils from the Paris area, the following conclusions are established:

  1. that there is an analogy between the behaviour of collapsing loess soils and that of sensitive clays,
  2. that the Feda criterion may be used to predict the collapse of a sample (Feda 1966), and
  3. that there are difficulties in using this criterion for practical problems due to the in situ variation of void ratio.




This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Geological Society, London, Engineering Geology Special PublicationsHome page
F. G. Bell and M. G. Culshaw
Some geohazards caused by soil mineralogy, chemistry and microfabric: a review
Geological Society, London, Engineering Geology Special Publications, 1998; 15: 427 - 441.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Geological Society, London, Engineering Geology Special PublicationsHome page
F.G. Bell, J.C. Cripps, and M.G. Culshaw
A review of the engineering behaviour of soils and rocks with respect to groundwater
Geological Society, London, Engineering Geology Special Publications, 1986; 3: 1 - 23.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Progress in Physical GeographyHome page
K. Pye and K. Pye
Loess
Progress in Physical Geography, 1984; 8: 176 - 217.
[PDF]