Skip to main content

Main menu

  • Home
    • Journal home
    • Lyell Collection home
    • Geological Society home
  • Content
    • Online First
    • Issue in progress
    • All issues
    • Thematic Collections
    • Supplementary publications
    • Open Access
  • Subscribe
    • GSL fellows
    • Institutions
    • Corporate
    • Other member types
  • Info
    • Authors
    • Librarians
    • Readers
    • GSL Fellows access
    • Other member types access
    • Press office
    • Accessibility
    • Help
    • Metrics
  • Alert sign up
    • eTOC alerts
    • Online First alerts
    • RSS feeds
    • Newsletters
    • GSL blog
  • Submit
  • Geological Society of London Publications
    • Engineering Geology Special Publications
    • Geochemistry: Exploration, Environment, Analysis
    • Journal of Micropalaeontology
    • Journal of the Geological Society
    • Lyell Collection home
    • Memoirs
    • Petroleum Geology Conference Series
    • Petroleum Geoscience
    • Proceedings of the Yorkshire Geological Society
    • Quarterly Journal of Engineering Geology and Hydrogeology
    • Quarterly Journal of the Geological Society
    • Scottish Journal of Geology
    • Special Publications
    • Transactions of the Edinburgh Geological Society
    • Transactions of the Geological Society of Glasgow
    • Transactions of the Geological Society of London

User menu

  • My alerts
  • Log in
  • My Cart

Search

  • Advanced search
Quarterly Journal of Engineering Geology and Hydrogeology
  • Geological Society of London Publications
    • Engineering Geology Special Publications
    • Geochemistry: Exploration, Environment, Analysis
    • Journal of Micropalaeontology
    • Journal of the Geological Society
    • Lyell Collection home
    • Memoirs
    • Petroleum Geology Conference Series
    • Petroleum Geoscience
    • Proceedings of the Yorkshire Geological Society
    • Quarterly Journal of Engineering Geology and Hydrogeology
    • Quarterly Journal of the Geological Society
    • Scottish Journal of Geology
    • Special Publications
    • Transactions of the Edinburgh Geological Society
    • Transactions of the Geological Society of Glasgow
    • Transactions of the Geological Society of London
  • My alerts
  • Log in
  • My Cart
  • Follow gsl on Twitter
  • Visit gsl on Facebook
  • Visit gsl on Youtube
  • Visit gsl on Linkedin
Quarterly Journal of Engineering Geology and Hydrogeology

Advanced search

  • Home
    • Journal home
    • Lyell Collection home
    • Geological Society home
  • Content
    • Online First
    • Issue in progress
    • All issues
    • Thematic Collections
    • Supplementary publications
    • Open Access
  • Subscribe
    • GSL fellows
    • Institutions
    • Corporate
    • Other member types
  • Info
    • Authors
    • Librarians
    • Readers
    • GSL Fellows access
    • Other member types access
    • Press office
    • Accessibility
    • Help
    • Metrics
  • Alert sign up
    • eTOC alerts
    • Online First alerts
    • RSS feeds
    • Newsletters
    • GSL blog
  • Submit

Analysing step-drawdown tests in heterogeneous aquifers

Gholam H. Karami and Paul L. Younger
Quarterly Journal of Engineering Geology and Hydrogeology, 35, 295-303, 1 August 2002, https://doi.org/10.1144/1470-9236/2002-9
Gholam H. Karami
11Department of Civil Engineering, University of Newcastle, Newcastle Upon Tyne NE1 7RU, UK(e-mail: G.H.Karami@ncl.ac.uk)
22Future address: Department of Geology, University of Shahrood, Shahrood, Iran
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Search for this author on this site
Paul L. Younger
11Department of Civil Engineering, University of Newcastle, Newcastle Upon Tyne NE1 7RU, UK(e-mail: G.H.Karami@ncl.ac.uk)
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Search for this author on this site
PreviousNext
  • Article
  • Figures & Data
  • Info & Metrics
  • PDF
Loading

Abstract

All existing methods for analysing step-drawdown test data assume that the aquifer is homogeneous, whereas most real aquifers are heterogeneous. Failure to account for such heterogeneity can lead to erroneous mis-interpretation of step-drawdown test results, which may in turn result in expensive over- or under-design of long-term pumping plant. This paper reports a new method for analysing step-drawdown data which not only takes heterogeneity into account, but which also turns out to be simpler and more robust than existing methods even where the aquifer is relatively homogeneous. The new method is equally applicable to confined, leaky, and unconfined aquifers. The heart of this method is a simple data transformation procedure (which we term ‘homogenization of drawdown records’), based on an obvious logic, that unambiguously separates aquifer losses and well losses. As such, the new method directly calculates the well loss in the pumping well without recourse to the equations and coefficients upon which the existingmethods of analysis are based. Extending the same logic, it is apparent that well loss can also be quantified using data from constant-rate pumping tests. The new method not only yields more consistent and reliable results than existing methods, but also enhances conceptual understanding of drawdown processes and is sufficiently simple that it can be implemented rapidly by manual calculations, allowing analysis of test data in the field, even while pumping continues.

  • aquifers
  • pumping
  • water wells
  • limestone
  • © 2002 The Geological Society of London
View Full Text

Please note that if you are logged into the Lyell Collection and attempt to access content that is outside of your subscription entitlement you will be presented with a new login screen. You have the option to pay to view this content if you choose. Please see the relevant links below for further assistance.

INDIVIDUALS

Log in using your username and password

– GSL fellows: log in with your Lyell username and password. (Please check your access entitlements at https://www.geolsoc.org.uk/fellowsaccess)
– Other users: log in with the username and password you created when you registered. Help for other users is at https://www.geolsoc.org.uk/lyellcollection_faqs
Forgot your username or password?

Purchase access

You may purchase access to this article for 24 hours and download the PDF within the access period. This will require you to create an account if you don't already have one. To download the PDF, click the 'Purchased Content' link in the receipt email.

LIBRARY USERS

Log in through your institution

You may be able to gain access using your login credentials for your institution. Contact your library if you do not have a username and password.
If your organization uses OpenAthens, you can log in using your OpenAthens username and password. To check if your institution is supported, please see this list. Contact your library for more details.
If you think you should have access, please contact your librarian or email sales@geolsoc.org.uk

LIBRARIANS

Administer your subscription.

CONTACT US

If you have any questions about the Lyell Collection publications website, please see the access help page or contact sales@geolsoc.org.uk

PreviousNext
Back to top

In this issue

Quarterly Journal of Engineering Geology and Hydrogeology: 35 (3)
Quarterly Journal of Engineering Geology and Hydrogeology
Volume 35, Issue 3
August 2002
  • Table of Contents
  • Index by author
Alerts
Sign In to Email Alerts with your Email Address
Citation tools

Analysing step-drawdown tests in heterogeneous aquifers

Gholam H. Karami and Paul L. Younger
Quarterly Journal of Engineering Geology and Hydrogeology, 35, 295-303, 1 August 2002, https://doi.org/10.1144/1470-9236/2002-9
Gholam H. Karami
11Department of Civil Engineering, University of Newcastle, Newcastle Upon Tyne NE1 7RU, UK(e-mail: G.H.Karami@ncl.ac.uk)
22Future address: Department of Geology, University of Shahrood, Shahrood, Iran
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Paul L. Younger
11Department of Civil Engineering, University of Newcastle, Newcastle Upon Tyne NE1 7RU, UK(e-mail: G.H.Karami@ncl.ac.uk)
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site

Citation Manager Formats

  • BibTeX
  • Bookends
  • EasyBib
  • EndNote (tagged)
  • EndNote 8 (xml)
  • Medlars
  • Mendeley
  • Papers
  • RefWorks Tagged
  • Ref Manager
  • RIS
  • Zotero
Permissions
View PDF
Share

Analysing step-drawdown tests in heterogeneous aquifers

Gholam H. Karami and Paul L. Younger
Quarterly Journal of Engineering Geology and Hydrogeology, 35, 295-303, 1 August 2002, https://doi.org/10.1144/1470-9236/2002-9
del.icio.us logo Digg logo Reddit logo Twitter logo CiteULike logo Facebook logo Google logo Mendeley logo
Email to

Thank you for sharing this Quarterly Journal of Engineering Geology and Hydrogeology article.

NOTE: We request your email address only to inform the recipient that it was you who recommended this article, and that it is not junk mail. We do not retain these email addresses.

Enter multiple addresses on separate lines or separate them with commas.
Analysing step-drawdown tests in heterogeneous aquifers
(Your Name) has forwarded a page to you from Quarterly Journal of Engineering Geology and Hydrogeology
(Your Name) thought you would be interested in this article in Quarterly Journal of Engineering Geology and Hydrogeology.
CAPTCHA
This question is for testing whether or not you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.
Print
Download PPT
  • Tweet Widget
  • Facebook Like
  • Google Plus One
  • Article
    • Abstract
    • Existing methods for analysing step-drawdown test data
    • A simple, new method for analysing step-drawdown test data
    • Homogenizing the step-test data using a reference pumping rate
    • Procedure for calculating aquifer loss and well loss
    • Comparing calculated drawdown and observed drawdown
    • Conclusions
    • Acknowledgements
    • References
  • Figures & Data
  • Info & Metrics
  • PDF

Related Articles

Similar Articles

Cited By...

More in this TOC Section

  • Remote thermal IR surveying to detect abandoned mineshafts in former mining areas
  • The use of microgravity to detect small distributed voids and low-density ground
  • A GIS-based prediction method to evaluate subsidence-induced damage from coal mining beneath a reservoir, Kyushu, Japan
Show more: Original Article
  • Most read
  • Most cited
Loading
  • The temperature of Britain's coalfields
  • Hydrogeological challenges in a low-carbon economy
  • Coastal processes in the Russian Baltic (eastern Gulf of Finland and Kaliningrad area)
  • Uncertainty assessment applied to marine subsurface datasets
  • Buried (drift-filled) hollows in London – a review of their location and key characteristics
More...

Quarterly Journal of Engineering Geology and Hydrogeology

  • About the journal
  • Editorial Board
  • Submit a manuscript
  • Author information
  • Supplementary Publications
  • Subscribe
  • Pay per view
  • Alerts & RSS
  • Copyright & Permissions
  • Activate Online Subscription
  • Feedback
  • Help

Lyell Collection

  • About the Lyell Collection
  • Lyell Collection homepage
  • Collections
  • Open Access Collection
  • Open Access Policy
  • Lyell Collection access help
  • Recommend to your Library
  • Lyell Collection Sponsors
  • MARC records
  • Digital preservation
  • Developing countries
  • Geofacets
  • Manage your account
  • Cookies

The Geological Society

  • About the Society
  • Join the Society
  • Benefits for Members
  • Online Bookshop
  • Publishing policies
  • Awards, Grants & Bursaries
  • Education & Careers
  • Events
  • Geoscientist Online
  • Library & Information Services
  • Policy & Media
  • Society blog
  • Contact the Society

Published by The Geological Society of London, registered charity number 210161

Print ISSN 
1470-9236
Online ISSN 
2041-4803

Copyright © 2021 Geological Society of London