Skip to main content

Main menu

  • Home
    • Journal home
    • Lyell Collection home
    • Geological Society home
  • Content
    • Online First
    • Issue in progress
    • All issues
    • All collections
    • Thematic Collections
    • Supplementary publications
    • Open Access
  • Subscribe
    • GSL fellows
    • Institutions
    • Corporate
    • Other member types
  • Info
    • Authors
    • Librarians
    • Readers
    • GSL Fellows access
    • Other member types access
    • Press office
    • Accessibility
    • Help
    • Metrics
  • Alert sign up
    • RSS feeds
    • Newsletters
  • Submit
  • Geological Society of London Publications
    • Engineering Geology Special Publications
    • Geochemistry: Exploration, Environment, Analysis
    • Journal of Micropalaeontology
    • Journal of the Geological Society
    • Lyell Collection home
    • Memoirs
    • Petroleum Geology Conference Series
    • Petroleum Geoscience
    • Proceedings of the Yorkshire Geological Society
    • Quarterly Journal of Engineering Geology and Hydrogeology
    • Quarterly Journal of the Geological Society
    • Scottish Journal of Geology
    • Special Publications
    • Transactions of the Edinburgh Geological Society
    • Transactions of the Geological Society of Glasgow
    • Transactions of the Geological Society of London

User menu

  • My alerts
  • Log in
  • Log out
  • My Cart

Search

  • Advanced search
Quarterly Journal of Engineering Geology and Hydrogeology
  • Geological Society of London Publications
    • Engineering Geology Special Publications
    • Geochemistry: Exploration, Environment, Analysis
    • Journal of Micropalaeontology
    • Journal of the Geological Society
    • Lyell Collection home
    • Memoirs
    • Petroleum Geology Conference Series
    • Petroleum Geoscience
    • Proceedings of the Yorkshire Geological Society
    • Quarterly Journal of Engineering Geology and Hydrogeology
    • Quarterly Journal of the Geological Society
    • Scottish Journal of Geology
    • Special Publications
    • Transactions of the Edinburgh Geological Society
    • Transactions of the Geological Society of Glasgow
    • Transactions of the Geological Society of London
  • My alerts
  • Log in
  • Log out
  • My Cart
  • Follow gsl on Twitter
  • Visit gsl on Facebook
  • Visit gsl on Youtube
  • Visit gsl on Linkedin
Quarterly Journal of Engineering Geology and Hydrogeology

Advanced search

  • Home
    • Journal home
    • Lyell Collection home
    • Geological Society home
  • Content
    • Online First
    • Issue in progress
    • All issues
    • All collections
    • Thematic Collections
    • Supplementary publications
    • Open Access
  • Subscribe
    • GSL fellows
    • Institutions
    • Corporate
    • Other member types
  • Info
    • Authors
    • Librarians
    • Readers
    • GSL Fellows access
    • Other member types access
    • Press office
    • Accessibility
    • Help
    • Metrics
  • Alert sign up
    • RSS feeds
    • Newsletters
  • Submit

The measured shallow temperature field in Britain

J. Busby, A. Kingdon and J. Williams
Quarterly Journal of Engineering Geology and Hydrogeology, 44, 373-387, 4 August 2011, https://doi.org/10.1144/1470-9236/10-049
J. Busby
British Geological Survey, Keyworth, Nottingham NG12 5GG, UK
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Search for this author on this site
  • For correspondence: [email protected]
A. Kingdon
British Geological Survey, Keyworth, Nottingham NG12 5GG, UK
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Search for this author on this site
J. Williams
British Geological Survey, Keyworth, Nottingham NG12 5GG, UK
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Search for this author on this site
PreviousNext
  • Article
  • Figures & Data
  • Info & Metrics
  • PDF
Loading

Abstract

Abstract The move towards a lower carbon society is likely to lead to a greater utilization of geothermal heat as the UK meets the challenge of its EU renewable obligation to source 15% of its energy from renewables by 2020. The shallow temperature field can be estimated, but measured temperatures are the most accurate approach for defining the shallow heat resource. Available measured temperature data have been used to compile maps of temperatures at depths below ground level of 100, 200, 500 and 1000 m. From these data regional trends and anomalies have been defined. From a consideration of all of the data a geothermal gradient of 28 °C km−1 has been calculated for the upper 1 km of the sedimentary crust, which is slightly above the previously quoted value of 26 °C km−1. Elevated temperatures have been mainly observed in eastern and southern England and have been attributed to convection within some of the thicker Permo-Triassic sandstones and the thermal blanketing effect of Triassic and Jurassic argillaceous rocks. Some of the depressed temperatures are associated with thick sequences of Carboniferous arenaceous rocks.

Exploitation of the shallow heat resource within the UK is set to increase over the next decade. The UK has signed up to the EU renewable obligation that will require the UK to source 15% of its energy from renewables by 2020 and has committed itself to sourcing 12% of heat from renewables by 2020 (DECC 2009). A proportion of this has the potential to be sourced from geothermal heat.

In the assessment of any geothermal prospect, subsurface temperature is the first parameter to be considered. Elevated temperatures do not necessarily indicate a viable geothermal resource as this depends on many factors including permeability, hydraulic transmissivity, heat capacity, thermal conductivity and sustainability. Improved designs for single-borehole heat exchangers have allowed geothermal exploitation without the requirement for an aquifer (e.g. Lundershausen et al. 2004). Hence, where there is demand for geothermal energy temperature anomalies are the primary targets for the initial stages of any geothermal exploration programme. In a region such as Britain, which is not subject to active tectonics, it is possible to consider a stable background temperature field. This will be determined by an upper boundary that comprises the ground surface, the effect of which is a temperature at a depth of 10–15 m that is equal to the mean annual soil temperature, which is typically 1 °C higher than the mean annual air temperature (Rybach & Sanner 2000). Below this level the temperature will increase with depth at a rate set by the geothermal gradient, which is itself determined by the vertical heat flow and the thermal conductivity of the rocks. Therefore, in principle, if the geological succession is known it is possible to estimate the temperature at any depth.

In practice, observed temperatures will differ from estimated temperatures for a variety of reasons.

  1. Heat flow is not one-dimensional, but will also be affected by lateral variations in thermal conductivity, a phenomenon often referred to as heat refraction.

  2. Groundwater flow will transport heat by advection and within any permeable horizon there will be convection. Such mechanisms could create both high and low temperature anomalies. The most obvious examples of this in Britain are the thermal springs at Bath (Gallois 2007) and in the Peak District (Brassington 2007), where groundwater is able to rise relatively rapidly from depth through fractured Carboniferous Limestone.

  3. Internal heat production from natural radioactive decay within some buried granites will increase the heat flow. This will increase temperatures within the overlying sedimentary rocks especially where they have lower thermal conductivities. Heat flow measurements taken above buried granites should include an element for the extra heat production, but geothermal boreholes to measure heat flow are sporadically located. Hence, it is possible that buried heat production sources have not been identified.

  4. Heat from a variety of anthropogenic sources can leak from the surface in urban areas resulting in a decrease of temperature with depth. This effect has been reported by Banks et al. (2009) for a site in the UK where a reversed geothermal gradient was observed to a depth of 55 m, and similar results have been reported from Osaka, Japan by Huang et al. (2009).

Therefore direct measurements of temperature remain the most accurate approach for defining the shallow heat resource.

Previous publications of the temperature field in Britain have concentrated on temperatures in the depth range of 4–7 km (Downing & Gray 1986a,b; Barker et al. 2000), as the purpose of those studies was to identify temperatures that might be suitable for geothermal electricity generation. In the past two decades it has become clear that the shallower heat, in the depth range above 1000 m, is a substantial and more easily accessible heat resource. For depths down to c. 200 m this can be exploited by ground source heat pump technology (e.g. Sanner et al. 2003; Banks 2009) and for greater depths by direct use applications (e.g. Lund & Freeston 2005; Lund 2010). To date there have been very few studies of shallow temperatures in Britain although there is increasing interest (e.g. Headon et al. 2009; Pike 2010).

Data compilation

This paper describes the amalgamation of temperature data from a number of sources to generate temperature datasets for four depth intervals. These depths are metres below ground level (mbgl) and not depths relative to Ordnance Datum, as in any geothermal exploration it is the depth of borehole that has to be drilled from the surface that is the key element in the project. Because mean annual air temperatures are dependent on topography it is possible that in the shallow data there may be a topographic signal.

The four depths at which temperatures have been compiled are 100, 200, 500 and 1000 mbgl. The three data sources are the Geothermal Catalogue, the digital national petrophysical data archive and hard copy temperature logs.

The Geothermal Catalogue

A catalogue of subsurface temperature, heat flow, thermal conductivity and geochemistry data was compiled as part of the ‘Investigation of the geothermal potential of the UK’ programme, funded by the UK Department of Energy and the European Commission between 1976 and 1988. The catalogue was originally published in 1978 (Burley & Edmunds 1978) and updated in three revisions (Burley & Gale 1982; Burley et al. 1984; Rollin 1987). During this period there was considerable onshore drilling activity, mainly for hydrocarbons, but because of commercial restrictions it was not possible to access all known data.

The categories of temperature in the catalogue are as follows.

  1. Equilibrium temperatures (EQM) are those taken specifically for the calculation of heat flow where the borehole was drilled months or years prior to temperature measurements, allowing the borehole temperature to equilibrate with the surroundings.

  2. Bottom hole temperatures (BHT) were recorded during routine geophysical logging and record the maximum temperature, which is assumed to be at the base of the hole.

  3. Wireline logs (LOG) are temperature profiles recorded by a logging tool over a length of a borehole.

  4. Coalfield measurements (CFM) were made at the end of horizontal boreholes specially drilled in coal mines.

  5. Mine water temperatures (MWT) are from small water flows issuing from rocks within a mine and all refer to Cornish mining.

  6. Virgin strata temperatures (VST) also refer to temperatures taken in coal mines in specially drilled boreholes, but where the temperature has been monitored over a period of time so that it is close to an equilibrium measurement.

  7. Drill stem tests (DST) are temperatures taken in hydrocarbon or water boreholes during drill stem tests. Because this involves the sampling of formation waters these temperatures should be less affected by the mud circulation than bottom hole temperatures.

The frequency distribution of these temperature data and any corrections that have been applied have been discussed by Rollin (1987, 1995). The main correction is that applied to the BHT data (which make up 50% of the catalogue data) to estimate equilibrium temperatures from transient temperatures measured during breaks in drilling. These corrections require the time since circulation of the drilling mud ceased (tc) and consist of an empirical correction derived from tc and the magnitude of the temperature or, in later revisions of the catalogue, derived from tc only. The BHT data where tc is not known will not have been corrected and are therefore likely to be underestimates of the temperature.

The data listings within the catalogue consist of temperatures at discrete depths. For the majority of sites only a few depth–temperature values are given. The exceptions are the equilibrium temperature boreholes where values are listed at 10 or 100 m depth intervals depending on the depth of the borehole. Therefore to produce temperature fields at depths of 100, 200, 500 and 1000 m some interpolation has been necessary. Interpolation of subsurface temperatures must be done with care as the temperature gradient depends on the thermal conductivity over the section of interest. Because thermal conductivity data are not available, interpolation has been restricted to the ranges shown in Table 1 for the temperature field depths considered.

View this table:
  • View inline
  • View popup
Table 1

Interpolation ranges used for calculating the temperatures at depths of 100, 200, 500 and 1000 mbgl and the number of compiled temperatures at those depths

The vast majority of interpolations are based on the calculated temperature gradient at the depth of the temperature measurement. In a small minority of cases the interpolation is made between two temperatures that span the temperature field depth.

The British Geological Survey (BGS) digital national petrophysical data archive

These data were interrogated to capture subsurface temperature data added to the digital archive since the compilation of the Geothermal Catalogue. Data consist of downhole temperature curves taken from logging runs during breaks in drilling. Spurious values (or spikes) are a common problem in logging because of the hostile conditions in which logging tools have to operate (underwater and at high temperatures and pressure). Therefore rather than simply recording the temperature at, for instance, 200 mbgl, the interval has been bracketed by ±5m (i.e. from 195 to 205 mbgl). The interpolation ranges and the number of data points extracted for these data are shown in Table 1.

Increasingly, oil and gas boreholes are drilled at an incline or substantially deviated from the vertical. In addition, for onshore Britain, which is heavily populated and where space is at a premium, there is an increasing tendency for deviated wells as this allows prospects to be drilled from more accessible locations than vertically above the target well. This technology is mainly used in the oil and gas sector because deviated drilling is too expensive to be used routinely in the water or civil engineering sectors, although occasionally deviated wells are drilled in other sectors such as radioactive waste disposal. Hence, it is increasingly important to account for borehole deviation when estimating temperature–depth relationships. Given that well depth is usually recorded as depth downhole along the line of the borehole trajectory, it is necessary to correct to True Vertical Depth (TVD); that is, the distance from a point below surface to a point vertically above it at ground level. This has been done by correlation with pre-existing TVD logs. In the case of horizontal wells these corrections may account for apparently long zones over which the data are averaged but in reality they are simply a reflection of the intersection of a steeply inclined (from vertical) to near-horizontal borehole with an interval of a few vertical metres in height below ground level.

Another borehole attribute that might adversely affect results is casing, which thermally insulates the borehole from the environment. Therefore careful examination of the logged interval in relation to casing depth has been made and logs through cased intervals have been eliminated.

Temperature log data have been collected for the oil and gas, coal, radioactive waste and water sectors, but there are no common quality standards operating across these industries. Data quality from comparatively inexpensive water industry logging is markedly poorer and more error prone than logging from other sectors.

Hard copy temperature logs

For many years, the BGS has been the custodian of a large quantity of hard copy petrophysical log data. These log data are derived mostly from either the hydrocarbon industry, British Coal exploration, or from BGS' own onshore research, and include a significant number of hard copy temperature logs. A simple approach was utilized whereby temperature values were extracted from selected logs at intervals of 100 m depth below ground level, taking into account any deviations of the well from the vertical. Because of time constraints not all logs could be examined and so an approach based first on accessibility and quality of data and then on maximum depth coverage and geographical location in relation to existing data points was applied. The interpolation ranges and the number of data points extracted for these data are also shown in Table 1.

Results

From Table 1 it can be seen that the total number of temperature measurements at depths of 100, 200, 500 and 1000 mbgl are 497, 384, 323 and 544 respectively. Some simple statistics from these data are shown in Table 2. The median temperatures are slightly lower than the means, indicating that a few high values are influencing the mean values. Hence the median values are preferred as representing central values. From the median values the representative geothermal gradient can be calculated. For the depth interval 0–100 m it equates to 22.0 °C km−1, for 0–200 m it equates to 30.0 °C km−1, for 0–500 m it equates to 26.4 °C km−1, for 500–1000 m it equates to 29.2 °C km−1, and for 0–1000 m it equates to 27.8 °C km−1. These data therefore suggest that the previous estimate for the geothermal gradient for onshore Britain (as 26 °C km−1; Downing & Gray 1986a) is slightly underestimated and a value of 28 °C km−1 is preferred for the upper 1 km of the sedimentary crust.

View this table:
  • View inline
  • View popup
Table 2

Mean and median temperatures from all of the compiled data at depths of 100, 200, 500 and 1000 mbgl

Fig. 1
  • Download figure
  • Open in new tab
  • Download powerpoint
Fig. 1

Location map of place names, regions and faults referred to in the text overlaid on a simplified lithological map of geology.

Figure 1 shows the locations that are used in the discussion of the data overlaid on a simplified lithological map of British geology. The purpose of the analyses here is to define regional temperature anomalies. Isolated temperatures that are significantly above or below the median values have been removed from the dataset, as otherwise when the data are gridded an anomaly of large areal extent will be created. It is possible that these outlying high or low values could be due to errors in data collection or recording, or they could be correct and result from local geological conditions. The remaining data have been gridded using a minimum curvature algorithm (Smith & Wessel 1990), and contour plots are shown in Figures 2– 5 along with the distribution of the data used in their compilation. The distribution of data points is inevitably concentrated over the Mesozoic and Carboniferous sedimentary basins, which were the focus for hydrocarbon and coal exploration, but with the exception of Scotland north of the Central Belt and parts of mid-Wales there is a reasonable distribution across most parts of Britain. Figure 6 shows a map of heat flow, the small quantity of heat that is conducted upwards from the interior of the Earth, for Britain (Downing & Gray 1986b; Lee et al. 1987; Rollin 1995; Barker et al. 2000).

Fig. 2
  • Download figure
  • Open in new tab
  • Download powerpoint
Fig. 2

Measured temperatures at 100 m depth below ground level. Measurement locations are indicated by the black dots.

Fig. 3
  • Download figure
  • Open in new tab
  • Download powerpoint
Fig. 3

Measured temperatures at 200 m depth below ground level. Measurement locations are indicated by the black dots.

Fig. 4
  • Download figure
  • Open in new tab
  • Download powerpoint
Fig. 4

Measured temperatures at 500 m depth below ground level. Measurement locations are indicated by the black dots.

Fig. 5
  • Download figure
  • Open in new tab
  • Download powerpoint
Fig. 5

Measured temperatures at 1000 m depth below ground level. Measurement locations are indicated by the black dots.

Fig. 6
  • Download figure
  • Open in new tab
  • Download powerpoint
Fig. 6

Heat flow map of Britain.

The temperatures at a depth of 100 mbgl (see Fig. 2) can be compared against the median temperature of 12.5 °C. There is a broad region extending from NE England, through the East Midlands and extending into central England SW of the Wash where temperatures are consistently above 14 °C and in places above 16 °C. In southern England temperatures are closer to the median value, with the exception of a hotspot to the north of the Isle of Wight defined by three boreholes around Winchester, where temperatures are reported as high as 25 °C. These boreholes are separated by 4.6, 3.1 and 3.2 km and are located around the apex of an antiformal structure within the chalk. The temperature anomaly does not continue to depth and so it is possible that fracturing within the Cretaceous sequence associated with the antiform has led to the migration of warmer water from depth.Temperatures in SW England are generally between 12 and 14 °C, slightly above the median but a little less than expected given the high heat flows in this region. In northern England over the North Pennines temperatures are reported below 10 °C, but this is most probably a reflection of the high topography. Data are very sparse across the Southern Uplands and temperatures are around the median value across the Central Belt. Busby et al. (2009) have published a map of estimated temperatures at depths of 100 mbgl based on a modelled ground surface temperature, the local heat flow and the bedrock geology, and this is reproduced here in Figure 7. There is reasonable agreement between the measured and estimated datasets; the above median temperatures of eastern and central England are replicated as are the cooler temperatures of the North Pennines. In SW England the pattern of temperature anomalies is in agreement, but the measured values are 1–2 °C below the estimated values.

Fig. 7
  • Download figure
  • Open in new tab
  • Download powerpoint
Fig. 7

Estimated temperatures at depths of 100 m below ground level based on a modelled ground surface temperature, the local heat flow and the bedrock geology, after Busby et al. (2009).

In Figure 3 it can be seen that temperatures at depths of 200 mbgl are again above the median value (16.3 °C) in NE England and the East Midlands, but these elevated temperatures do not continue into central England. Average temperatures occur over most of southern England, with two regions of elevated temperatures. The first is an arcuate belt from central England that curves around the London area and across the Weald to the south coast. The second is a broad zone over the Wessex Basin to the north of the Isle of Wight. Temperatures are around average in western England with lower values over the North Pennines. Data are again sparse over the Southern Uplands and Scotland. These measured data can again be compared with estimated values. It is an oversimplification to assume that the surface bedrock geology is representative to a depth of 200 m and so the geological logs from 522 boreholes have been assigned average thermal conductivities. This information has then been combined with modelled ground surface temperatures and heat flow to generate the estimated temperatures at 200 mbgl, and these are shown in Figure 8. Estimated temperatures in NE England and the East Midlands are elevated, with values of over 18 °C, and, as seen in the measured data, this zone does not extend into central England. Over parts of the Wessex Basin estimated temperatures are raised, but the higher measured temperatures observed over the Weald are not seen in the estimated temperatures where values are generally less than 16 °C.

Fig. 8
  • Download figure
  • Open in new tab
  • Download powerpoint
Fig. 8

Estimated temperatures at 200 m depth below ground level. The estimates are modelled using a 1D heat conduction model from 522 boreholes, the locations of which are indicated by the black dots.

The median temperature at 500 mbgl is 23.5 °C and as can be seen in Figure 4 there are several zones where this temperature is exceeded. In northern England, around Weardale, measured temperatures are in excess of 28 °C and elevated temperatures also occur in NE England. In the East Midlands temperatures are generally above 28 °C and there is a zone around the Wash where they exceed 32 °C. Values are above 24 °C in western England and exceed 32 °C in the Weald. Measured temperatures are above 28 °C in the northern Wessex Basin, north Devon and Cornwall. A significant zone of lower measured temperatures is observed in western central England with values generally below 20 °C, and in south Wales values are less than 24 °C but increase towards the coast. A plot of the estimated temperature at 500 mbgl is shown in Figure 9. It was produced from the same 522 boreholes as used for the 200 mbgl estimated temperature map and involved assigning average thermal conductivities for the geological succession down to 500 m depth. The general pattern of anomalies is very similar to the 200 m depth estimated plot with above-median temperatures in NE England, the East Midlands and over parts of the Wessex Basin.

Fig. 9
  • Download figure
  • Open in new tab
  • Download powerpoint
Fig. 9

Estimated temperatures at 500 m depth below ground level. The estimates are modelled using a 1D heat conduction model from 522 boreholes the locations of which are indicated by the black dots.

Figure 5 is a plot of the measured temperatures at depths of 1000 mbgl where the median temperature is 38.1 °C. There is a broad zone in northern England where temperatures are above 46 °C although it is only defined by a small number of measurements. Much of the East Midlands is above the median temperature, although there is a complicated pattern of anomalies over the south Pennines that continues into central England where both high and low temperatures have been measured. Over large areas of the Wessex Basin and the Weald temperatures are above 46 °C. SW England is not represented in the plot because of a lack of measured data at 1000 m depth mbgl. The high heat flows associated with the Hercynian granites of the area (see Fig. 6) should lead to anomalous high temperatures.

Discussion

The distribution of the measured data is variable. For the 100 and 200 m depth intervals there is reasonable coverage across most of England, the Central Belt in Scotland and the coastal regions of Wales. However, for the deeper 500 and 1000 m depth intervals the majority of the data are concentrated in central and southern England. Any discussion of the regional temperature variation is limited by the data distribution. There is also considerable variability within the data. As stated above, anomalies defined by single outlying high or low temperatures have been removed from the dataset. These do not, however, remove every ‘bulls-eye’ anomaly and in some areas with a reasonable data density there is a complex pattern of anomalies. These are most probably due to local variations and data errors. Clearly, the data distribution is insufficient to define local anomalies and so the discussion is limited to regional trends.

All of the measured datasets show above-median temperatures in NE England and the East Midlands. This area corresponds to the subcrop of the East Yorkshire and Lincolnshire Basin, a sequence ranging in age from the Permian to the Cretaceous that dips gently to the east. The strata crop out to the east of the southern Pennines and the Permian is buried to depths of more than 2 km along the east Yorkshire coast. The main aquifer is the Triassic Sherwood Sandstone Group, which has been studied for its geothermal potential (Gale et al. 1983). Its maximum thickness is over 500 m to the south of Bridlington and it is greater than 100 m thick over most of the basin. Because of the easterly dip of the strata cooler water could flow to depth, but the movement of water is reported to be slow and restricted to near the outcrop of the formation (Downing et al. 1987), as there is no flow from the confined aquifer to the east. Over much of the area the porosity of the sandstone exceeds 20% and its average intergranular permeability is estimated to exceed 200 mD, with fractures enhancing the overall permeability. The Sherwood Sandstone Group has an average thermal conductivity of around 3.4 W m−1 K−1 (Rollin 1987). Hence from a combination of convective and conductive heat transport there is likely to be a low thermal gradient across the Sherwood Sandstone with enhanced temperatures near the top of the formation. However, it is overlain by the low thermal conductivity Mercia Mudstone Group and the argillaceous formations of the Jurassic, which create a blanketing effect that leads to raised temperatures. It has been suggested (Downing et al. 1987) that saline waters from the Carboniferous may be recharging the Sherwood Sandstone from below and this would also contribute to increased temperatures. The 1000 mbgl surface intersects the Sherwood Sandstone and the underlying Carboniferous strata westwards from the east coast, resulting in a more complicated set of temperature anomaly patterns. A small thermal high (the Eakring anomaly) is known in the East Midlands (Bullard & Niblett 1951). Wilson & Luheshi (1987) have modelled this anomaly as arising from the ascent of water up a steep faulted anticline in the Lower Carboniferous Limestone. It is observed in the 500 mbgl data but is less clear in the other datasets owing to its local nature. Recharge of the Carboniferous Limestone occurs to the east and may cause local suppression of subsurface temperatures.

In southern England heat anomalies above the median values are variably developed. In the region between London and the south coast, anomalies are observed in the 200, 500 and 1000 mbgl datasets, but farther west in the area to the north of the Isle of Wight anomalies are seen only in the 200 and 1000 mbgl data (with the anomaly around Winchester in the 100 mbgl data already noted above). This whole region is underlain by the Wessex Basin, which has very different characteristics in the east and west. In the west there is a reasonably complete succession from the Cenozoic to the Permian, whereas in the east (the Weald sub-basin) inversion has created an anticline with older (Cretaceous and Jurassic) rocks exposed at the surface. Beneath the Weald, Jurassic rocks rest unconformably on Devonian rocks. The Triassic Sherwood Sandstone Group does not occur in the subcrop east of the Portsdown Middleton Fault and north of the Mere Fault (see Fig. 1). At a depth of 1000 mbgl in the west there is generally a thick sequence of Jurassic clay and the temperature anomalies are most probably due to the blanketing effect of these low thermal conductivity rocks. The Sherwood Sandstone Group generally occurs at depths of between 1000 and 1800 mbgl (with the exception of the Dorset Basin, where depths are up to 2200 m) and it is possible that convection and conduction within the sandstone may contribute to the anomaly. To the east, thick successions of Jurassic mudstones are still encountered at 1000 mbgl and would again appear to be the cause of the high thermal anomalies. To the north of the basin, where temperatures are slightly less than the median temperature, boreholes at 1000 mbgl prove Devonian sandstones or Lower Palaeozoic rocks, which have higher thermal conductivities. In the 500 mbgl data in the Weald Basin, boreholes again intersect thick sequences of Jurassic clays, whereas farther east sandier Cretaceous formations are encountered.

To the north of the Wessex Basin is the north–south-trending Worcester Basin, which can be located by the Kempsey borehole that was drilled in the NW of the basin. At its centre it contains a great thickness of Permo-Triassic sandstones overlain by the Mercia Mudstone Group and, in the SW of the basin, Lower Jurassic strata. At 1000 mbgl the Kempsey borehole records a below-median temperature of 32 °C in a sequence of Sherwood Sandstone overlain by (from surface to 348 m depth) Mercia Mudstone. In contrast, on the SW margin of the basin higher than median temperatures are recorded in the 1000 mbgl data. Here the sequence comprises Carboniferous Westphalian mudstones of the Grovesend Formation overlain by Mercia Mudstone and Jurassic clays. To the north, near Coventry, a series of boreholes define a distinct low-temperature anomaly of 24 °C or less in the 1000 mbgl data. Carboniferous Westphalian strata extend from outcrop to depth, but unlike the Westphalian strata to the south these are arenaceous deposits of the Warwickshire Group. These data clearly indicate that thick sequences of higher thermal conductivity arenaceous strata lead to lower temperatures compared with areas where the blanketing effect of lower thermal conductivity mudstones enhance the temperature.

In south Wales thick sequences of arenaceous Coal Measures strata again lead to lower than median temperatures in the 1000, 500 and 200 mbgl data. In northern England there is a broad anomaly, above 46 °C, in the 1000 mbgl data. The broad nature of this anomaly is due to the paucity of data and is centred on the Rookhope borehole, which intersected the Weardale granite at a depth of 390 m (Dunham et al. 1965), and the Brafferton 1 borehole, which intersected a thick sequence of Carboniferous limestone and may represent a localized anomaly. A thermal high is expected across northern England owing to the buried Weardale granite, which has elevated heat production (Downing & Gray 1986a,b) and is overlain by relatively low thermal conductivity Carboniferous sedimentary rocks that will contribute to a blanketing effect. High temperatures were confirmed by the Eastgate borehole (Manning et al. 2007) drilled only a few kilometres from Rookhope, which reported a BHT of 46.2 °C at a depth of 995 m (compared with 40.4 °C at a depth of 806 m at Rookhope). Elevated temperatures are also known in Cornwall from the Rosemanowes HDR project, where a BHT of 79 °C was recorded at a depth of 2 km in the Carnmenellis granite (Parker 1999). To date there are no other deep temperature measurements in Cornwall and the majority of the measurements on the shallower depth plots are mine water temperatures.

Exploitation of direct use geothermal energy is set to increase especially as incentives (e.g. Renewable Heat Incentive in the UK) are introduced to meet governmental targets for carbon reduction and an increased utilization of renewable heat. Lund (2010) reported a 79% increase in worldwide direct use geothermal energy between 2005 and 2009, growing at a compound rate of 12.3% annually. For the depths and temperatures discussed here, likely UK growth areas for geothermal direct use heat are greenhouses and open ground heating, bathing and swimming, aquaculture and single-borehole heat exchangers. Elevated temperatures in the very shallow section will increase the heating efficiency of ground source heat pump systems.

Conclusions

This paper has compiled temperature data in the depth range down to 1000 mbgl for Britain. These data are difficult to interpret because of an uneven distribution in location and depth, different measurement procedures and a lack of quality control. However, they are the only dataset of measured temperatures and represent the ground truth for estimated temperatures. Isolated high and low values are evident in the data and these could be localized anomalies or errors. As the purpose of the analyses has been to define regional anomalies, extreme single point low and high values have been removed. Other single point anomalies still exist, but these have a less distorting effect than the extreme values.

From a consideration of all of the data a geothermal gradient of 28 °C km−1 has been calculated for the upper 1 km of the sedimentary crust, which is slightly above the previously quoted value of 26 °C km−1 (Downing & Gray 1986a). In regions underlain by non-granitic crystalline rock the gradient will be lower because of their generally higher thermal conductivities and in regions underlain by heat-producing granites it will be higher. Elevated temperatures have been mainly observed in eastern and southern England, and have been attributed to convection within some of the thicker Permo-Triassic sandstones and the thermal blanketing effect of Triassic and Jurassic argillaceous rocks. Some of the depressed temperatures are associated with thick sequences of Carboniferous arenaceous rocks.

Temperature maps with an improved distribution of contours will ultimately depend on estimated and measured data for their compilation. The estimated data presented here show fairly good agreement with the measured data, but they are still based on single borehole locations. Improved estimations will require 3D geological models down to the depth of interest that will allow temperature variations caused by groundwater movements as well as the thermal conductivity variations to be taken into account.

Acknowledgements

This paper is published by permission of the Executive Director of the British Geological Survey (NERC).

  • © 2011 Geological Society of London

References

  1. ↵
    1. Banks D.
    2009. Introduction to thermogeology and the exploitation of ground source heat. Quarterly Journal of Engineering Geology and Hydrogeology, 42, 283–293.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  2. ↵
    1. Banks D.,
    2. Gandy C.J.,
    3. Younger P.L.,
    4. Withers J.,
    5. Underwood C.
    2009. Anthropogenic thermogeological ‘anomaly’ in Gateshead, Tyne and Wear, UK. Quarterly Journal of Engineering Geology and Hydrogeology, 42, 307–312.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  3. ↵
    1. Barker J.A.,
    2. Downing R.A.,
    3. Gray D.A.,
    4. Findlay J.,
    5. Kellaway G.A.,
    6. Parker R.H.,
    7. Rollin K.E.
    2000. Hydrogeothermal studies in the United Kingdom. Quarterly Journal of Engineering Geology and Hydrogeology, 33, 41–58.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  4. ↵
    1. Brassington F.C.
    2007. A proposed conceptual model for the genesis of the Derbyshire thermal springs. Quarterly Journal of Engineering Geology and Hydrogeology, 40, 35–46.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  5. ↵
    1. Bullard E.C.,
    2. Niblett E.R.
    1951. Terrestrial heat flow in England. Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society. Geophysical Supplement, 6, 222–238.
    OpenUrl
  6. ↵
    1. Burley A.J.,
    2. Edmunds W.M.
    1978. Catalogue of geothermal data for the land area of the United Kingdom. Investigation of the Geothermal Potential of the UK. Department of Energy, London.
  7. ↵
    1. Burley A.J.,
    2. Gale I.N.
    1982. Catalogue of geothermal data for the land area of the United Kingdom. First revision: August 1981. Investigation of the Geothermal Potential of the UK. Institute of Geological Sciences, Keyworth.
  8. ↵
    1. Burley A.J.,
    2. Edmunds W.M.,
    3. Gale I.N.
    1984. Catalogue of geothermal data for the land area of the United Kingdom. Second revision: April 1984. Investigation of the Geothermal Potential of the UK. British Geological Survey, Keyworth.
  9. ↵
    1. Busby J.,
    2. Lewis M.,
    3. Reeves H.,
    4. Lawley R.
    2009. Initial geological considerations before installing ground source heat pump systems. Quarterly Journal of Engineering Geology and Hydrogeology, 42, 295–306.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  10. ↵
    DECC 2009. The UK Renewable Energy Strategy. Department of Energy and Climate Change, London.
  11. ↵
    1. Downing R.A.,
    2. Gray D.A.
    (eds) 1986a. Geothermal energy—the potential in the United Kingdom. HMSO, London.
  12. ↵
    1. Downing R.A.,
    2. Gray D.A.
    1986b. Geothermal resources of the United Kingdom. Journal of the Geological Society, London, 143, 499–507.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  13. ↵
    1. Downing R.A.,
    2. Edmunds W.M.,
    3. Gale I.N.
    1987. Regional groundwater flow in sedimentary basins in the UK. In: Goff J.C., Williams B.P.J. (eds) Fluid Flow in Sedimentary Basins and Aquifers. Geological Society, London, Special Publications, 34, 105–125.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  14. ↵
    1. Dunham K.C.,
    2. Dunham A.C.,
    3. Hodge B.L.,
    4. Johnson G.A.L.
    1965. Granite beneath Viséan sediments with mineralization at Rookhope, northern Pennines. Quarterly Journal of the Geological Society of London, 121, 383–417.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  15. ↵
    1. Gale I.N.,
    2. Smith I.F.,
    3. Downing R.A.
    1983. The post-Carboniferous rocks of the East Yorkshire and Lincolnshire Basin. Investigation of the Geothermal Potential of the UK. Institute of Geological Sciences, Keyworth.
  16. ↵
    1. Gallois R.
    2007. The formation of the hot springs at Bath Spa, UK. Geological Magazine, 144, 741–747.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  17. ↵
    1. Headon J.,
    2. Banks D.,
    3. Waters A.,
    4. Robinson V.K.
    2009. Regional distribution of ground temperature in the Chalk aquifer of London, UK. Quarterly Journal of Engineering Geology and Hydrogeology, 42, 313–323.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  18. ↵
    1. Huang S.,
    2. Taniguchi M.,
    3. Yamano M.,
    4. Wang C.H.
    2009. Detecting urbanization effects on surface and subsurface thermal environment—a case study of Osaka. Science of the Total Environment, 407, 3142–3152.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  19. ↵
    1. Lee M.K.,
    2. Brown G.C.,
    3. Webb P.C.,
    4. Wheildon J.,
    5. Rollin K.E.
    1987. Heat flow, heat production and thermo-tectonic setting in mainland UK. Journal of the Geological Society, London, 144, 35–42.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  20. ↵
    1. Lund J.W.
    2010. Direct utilization of geothermal energy. Energies, 3, 1443–1471.
    OpenUrlCrossRefWeb of Science
  21. ↵
    1. Lund J.W.,
    2. Freeston D.H.
    2005. Direct application of geothermal energy: 2005 worldwide review. Geothermics, 34, 691–727.
    OpenUrlCrossRefWeb of Science
  22. ↵
    1. Lundershausen S.,
    2. Niemann-Delius Ch.,
    3. Herzog Ch.,
    4. Preuße A.,
    5. Schloenbach M.,
    6. Oesterreich B.,
    7. von Hagke Ch.
    2004. Erdwärme für das SuperC—Die Geothermiebohrung RWTH-1—erste Erfahrungen. Glückauf, 140, 583–591.
    OpenUrl
  23. ↵
    1. Manning D.A.C.,
    2. Younger P.L.,
    3. Smith F.W.,
    4. Jones J.M.,
    5. Dufton D.J.,
    6. Diskin S.
    2007. A deep geothermal exploration well at Eastgate, Weardale: a novel exploration concept for low-enthalpy resources. Journal of the Geological Society, London, 164, 371–382.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  24. ↵
    1. Parker R.H.
    1999. The Rosemanowes HDR Project 1983–1991. Geothermics, 28, 603–615.
    OpenUrlCrossRefWeb of Science
  25. ↵
    1. Pike D.
    2010. Thermogeology and fluid conductivity of the Chalk aquifer around the western extent of the London Basin syncline. MSc thesis, University of Leeds.
  26. ↵
    1. Rollin K.E.
    1987. Catalogue of geothermal data for the land area of the United Kingdom. Third revision: April 1987. Investigation of the Geothermal Potential of the UK. British Geological Survey, Keyworth.
  27. ↵
    1. Rollin K.E.
    1995. A simple heat-flow quality function and appraisal of heat-flow measurements and heat-flow estimates from the UK Geothermal Catalogue. Tectonophysics, 244, 185–196.
    OpenUrlCrossRefWeb of Science
  28. ↵
    1. Rybach L.,
    2. Sanner B.
    2000. Ground-source heat pump systems; the European experience. Geo-Heat Center Bulletin, 21, 16–26.
    OpenUrl
  29. ↵
    1. Sanner B.,
    2. Karytsas C.,
    3. Mendrinos D.,
    4. Rybach L.
    2003. Current status of ground source heat pumps and underground thermal energy storage in Europe. Geothermics, 32, 579–588.
    OpenUrlCrossRefWeb of Science
  30. ↵
    1. Smith W.H.F.,
    2. Wessel P.
    1990. Gridding with continuous curvature splines in tension. Geophysics, 55, 293–305.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  31. ↵
    1. Wilson N.P.,
    2. Luheshi M.N.
    1987. Thermal aspects of the East Midlands aquifer system. In: Goff J.C., Williams B.P.J. (eds) Fluid Flow in Sedimentary Basins and Aquifers. Geological Society, London, Special Publications, 34, 157–169.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
PreviousNext
Back to top

In this issue

Quarterly Journal of Engineering Geology and Hydrogeology: 44 (3)
Quarterly Journal of Engineering Geology and Hydrogeology
Volume 44, Issue 3
August 2011
  • Table of Contents
  • Table of Contents (PDF)
  • About the Cover
  • Index by author
  • Back Matter (PDF)
  • Front Matter (PDF)
Alerts
Sign In to Email Alerts with your Email Address
Citation tools

The measured shallow temperature field in Britain

J. Busby, A. Kingdon and J. Williams
Quarterly Journal of Engineering Geology and Hydrogeology, 44, 373-387, 4 August 2011, https://doi.org/10.1144/1470-9236/10-049
J. Busby
British Geological Survey, Keyworth, Nottingham NG12 5GG, UK
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • For correspondence: [email protected]
A. Kingdon
British Geological Survey, Keyworth, Nottingham NG12 5GG, UK
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
J. Williams
British Geological Survey, Keyworth, Nottingham NG12 5GG, UK
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site

Citation Manager Formats

  • BibTeX
  • Bookends
  • EasyBib
  • EndNote (tagged)
  • EndNote 8 (xml)
  • Medlars
  • Mendeley
  • Papers
  • RefWorks Tagged
  • Ref Manager
  • RIS
  • Zotero
Permissions
View PDF
Share

The measured shallow temperature field in Britain

J. Busby, A. Kingdon and J. Williams
Quarterly Journal of Engineering Geology and Hydrogeology, 44, 373-387, 4 August 2011, https://doi.org/10.1144/1470-9236/10-049
del.icio.us logo Digg logo Reddit logo Twitter logo CiteULike logo Facebook logo Google logo Mendeley logo
Email to

Thank you for sharing this Quarterly Journal of Engineering Geology and Hydrogeology article.

NOTE: We request your email address only to inform the recipient that it was you who recommended this article, and that it is not junk mail. We do not retain these email addresses.

Enter multiple addresses on separate lines or separate them with commas.
The measured shallow temperature field in Britain
(Your Name) has forwarded a page to you from Quarterly Journal of Engineering Geology and Hydrogeology
(Your Name) thought you would be interested in this article in Quarterly Journal of Engineering Geology and Hydrogeology.
CAPTCHA
This question is for testing whether or not you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.
Print
Download PPT
Bookmark this article
  • Tweet Widget
  • Facebook Like
  • Google Plus One
  • Article
    • Abstract
    • Data compilation
    • The British Geological Survey (BGS) digital national petrophysical data archive
    • Hard copy temperature logs
    • Results
    • Discussion
    • Conclusions
    • Acknowledgements
    • References
  • Figures & Data
  • Info & Metrics
  • PDF

Related Articles

Similar Articles

Cited By...

More in this TOC Section

  • Prediction of strength of rock after thermal treatment through dielectric property
  • Simulating the effect of injection well on groundwater table in unconfined aquifer using numerical model of isogeometric analysis and optimization of injection rate with PSO algorithm
  • Strength Damage Mechanism and Pore Structure Evolution of Modified Pisha-Sandstone Cement Soil with Metakaolin
Show more: Research article
  • Most read
  • Most cited
Loading
  • Performance of slope stabilization trials on the road network of Laos
  • The temperature of Britain's coalfields
  • The role of engineering geology in delivering the United Nations Sustainable Development Goals
  • Mapping the Geology and Topography of the European Seas (European Marine Observation and Data Network, EMODnet)
  • Drilling into mines for heat: geological synthesis of the UK Geoenergy Observatory in Glasgow and implications for mine water heat resources
More...

Quarterly Journal of Engineering Geology and Hydrogeology

  • About the journal
  • Editorial Board
  • Submit a manuscript
  • Author information
  • Supplementary Publications
  • Subscribe
  • Pay per view
  • Copyright & Permissions
  • Activate Online Subscription
  • Feedback
  • Help

Lyell Collection

  • About the Lyell Collection
  • Lyell Collection homepage
  • Collections
  • Open Access Collection
  • Open Access Policy
  • Lyell Collection access help
  • Recommend to your Library
  • Lyell Collection Sponsors
  • MARC records
  • Digital preservation
  • Developing countries
  • Geofacets
  • Manage your account
  • Cookies

The Geological Society

  • About the Society
  • Join the Society
  • Benefits for Members
  • Online Bookshop
  • Publishing policies
  • Awards, Grants & Bursaries
  • Education & Careers
  • Events
  • Geoscientist Online
  • Library & Information Services
  • Policy & Media
  • Society blog
  • Contact the Society

Published by The Geological Society of London, registered charity number 210161

Print ISSN 
1470-9236
Online ISSN 
2041-4803

Copyright © 2022 Geological Society of London