Skip to main content

Main menu

  • Home
    • Journal home
    • Lyell Collection home
    • Geological Society home
  • Content
    • Online First
    • Issue in progress
    • All issues
    • All collections
    • Thematic Collections
    • Supplementary publications
    • Open Access
  • Subscribe
    • GSL fellows
    • Institutions
    • Corporate
    • Other member types
  • Info
    • Authors
    • Librarians
    • Readers
    • GSL Fellows access
    • Other member types access
    • Press office
    • Accessibility
    • Help
    • Metrics
  • Alert sign up
    • RSS feeds
    • Newsletters
  • Submit
  • Geological Society of London Publications
    • Engineering Geology Special Publications
    • Geochemistry: Exploration, Environment, Analysis
    • Journal of Micropalaeontology
    • Journal of the Geological Society
    • Lyell Collection home
    • Memoirs
    • Petroleum Geology Conference Series
    • Petroleum Geoscience
    • Proceedings of the Yorkshire Geological Society
    • Quarterly Journal of Engineering Geology and Hydrogeology
    • Quarterly Journal of the Geological Society
    • Scottish Journal of Geology
    • Special Publications
    • Transactions of the Edinburgh Geological Society
    • Transactions of the Geological Society of Glasgow
    • Transactions of the Geological Society of London

User menu

  • My alerts
  • Log in
  • My Cart

Search

  • Advanced search
Quarterly Journal of Engineering Geology and Hydrogeology
  • Geological Society of London Publications
    • Engineering Geology Special Publications
    • Geochemistry: Exploration, Environment, Analysis
    • Journal of Micropalaeontology
    • Journal of the Geological Society
    • Lyell Collection home
    • Memoirs
    • Petroleum Geology Conference Series
    • Petroleum Geoscience
    • Proceedings of the Yorkshire Geological Society
    • Quarterly Journal of Engineering Geology and Hydrogeology
    • Quarterly Journal of the Geological Society
    • Scottish Journal of Geology
    • Special Publications
    • Transactions of the Edinburgh Geological Society
    • Transactions of the Geological Society of Glasgow
    • Transactions of the Geological Society of London
  • My alerts
  • Log in
  • My Cart
  • Follow gsl on Twitter
  • Visit gsl on Facebook
  • Visit gsl on Youtube
  • Visit gsl on Linkedin
Quarterly Journal of Engineering Geology and Hydrogeology

Advanced search

  • Home
    • Journal home
    • Lyell Collection home
    • Geological Society home
  • Content
    • Online First
    • Issue in progress
    • All issues
    • All collections
    • Thematic Collections
    • Supplementary publications
    • Open Access
  • Subscribe
    • GSL fellows
    • Institutions
    • Corporate
    • Other member types
  • Info
    • Authors
    • Librarians
    • Readers
    • GSL Fellows access
    • Other member types access
    • Press office
    • Accessibility
    • Help
    • Metrics
  • Alert sign up
    • RSS feeds
    • Newsletters
  • Submit

Comparison and combination of different models for optimal landslide susceptibility zonation

Guan Chen, Xingmin Meng, Long Tan, Fanyu Zhang and Liang Qiao
Quarterly Journal of Engineering Geology and Hydrogeology, 47, 283-306, 20 October 2014, https://doi.org/10.1144/qjegh2013-071
Guan Chen
1Key Laboratory of Western China’s Environmental Systems, Ministry of Education, Lanzhou, China
2Research School of Arid Environment and Climate Change, Lanzhou University, Lanzhou, China
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Search for this author on this site
Xingmin Meng
1Key Laboratory of Western China’s Environmental Systems, Ministry of Education, Lanzhou, China
2Research School of Arid Environment and Climate Change, Lanzhou University, Lanzhou, China
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Search for this author on this site
  • For correspondence: [email protected]
Long Tan
1Key Laboratory of Western China’s Environmental Systems, Ministry of Education, Lanzhou, China
2Research School of Arid Environment and Climate Change, Lanzhou University, Lanzhou, China
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Search for this author on this site
Fanyu Zhang
3School of Civil Engineering and Mechanics, Lanzhou University, Lanzhou, China
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Search for this author on this site
Liang Qiao
1Key Laboratory of Western China’s Environmental Systems, Ministry of Education, Lanzhou, China
2Research School of Arid Environment and Climate Change, Lanzhou University, Lanzhou, China
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Search for this author on this site
PreviousNext
  • Article
  • Figures & Data
  • Info & Metrics
  • PDF
Loading

Abstract

It is important to compare different methods and apply combined models for landslide susceptibility zonation on a regional scale for land-use planning and hazard mitigation. The purpose of this study is attempt to obtain an optimal landslide susceptibility zonation in a severely landslide affected region where the available data are very limited. Six single models (analytical hierarchy process (AHP), logistic regression (LR), fuzzy logic (FL), weight of evidence integrated logistic regression (WL), artificial neural network (ANN) and support vector machine (SVM)), were applied to obtain the single landslide susceptibility zonations along the middle reaches of the Bailong River from Zhouqu to Wudu, southern Gansu, China, then these single models were compared, after which the three single models that performed better (LR, ANN and SVM) were selected to prepare the combined zonations. Six conditional independent environmental factors were selected as the explanatory variables that contribute to landslide occurrence (elevation, slope, aspect, distance from fault, lithology and settlement density). The mapped landslides in this region were randomly partitioned into two sets: 80% of the landslides were used for the model training and the remaining 20% were used for validation of the models. Receiver operating characteristic and cost curves were plotted as means of evaluating the quality of the susceptibility zonations for the single and combined models. Results show that the single LR, ANN and SVM are models with superior prediction performance and are more suitable for constructing the combined models in this study. Compared with single models, the combined models provided an improved prediction capability and reduced uncertainties.

  • © 2014 The Geological Society of London
View Full Text

Please note that if you are logged into the Lyell Collection and attempt to access content that is outside of your subscription entitlement you will be presented with a new login screen. You have the option to pay to view this content if you choose. Please see the relevant links below for further assistance.

INDIVIDUALS

Log in using your username and password

– GSL fellows: log in with your Lyell username and password. (Please check your access entitlements at https://www.geolsoc.org.uk/fellowsaccess)
– Other users: log in with the username and password you created when you registered. Help for other users is at https://www.geolsoc.org.uk/lyellcollection_faqs
Forgot your username or password?

Purchase access

You may purchase access to this article for 24 hours and download the PDF within the access period. This will require you to create an account if you don't already have one. To download the PDF, click the 'Purchased Content' link in the receipt email.

LIBRARY USERS

Log in through your institution

You may be able to gain access using your login credentials for your institution. Contact your library if you do not have a username and password.
If your organization uses OpenAthens, you can log in using your OpenAthens username and password. To check if your institution is supported, please see this list. Contact your library for more details.
If you think you should have access, please contact your librarian or email [email protected]

LIBRARIANS

Administer your subscription.

CONTACT US

If you have any questions about the Lyell Collection publications website, please see the access help page or contact [email protected]

PreviousNext
Back to top

In this issue

Quarterly Journal of Engineering Geology and Hydrogeology: 47 (4)
Quarterly Journal of Engineering Geology and Hydrogeology
Volume 47, Issue 4
November 2014
  • Table of Contents
  • Table of Contents (PDF)
  • About the Cover
  • Index by author
  • Back Matter (PDF)
  • Front Matter (PDF)
Alerts
Sign In to Email Alerts with your Email Address
Citation tools

Comparison and combination of different models for optimal landslide susceptibility zonation

Guan Chen, Xingmin Meng, Long Tan, Fanyu Zhang and Liang Qiao
Quarterly Journal of Engineering Geology and Hydrogeology, 47, 283-306, 20 October 2014, https://doi.org/10.1144/qjegh2013-071
Guan Chen
1Key Laboratory of Western China’s Environmental Systems, Ministry of Education, Lanzhou, China
2Research School of Arid Environment and Climate Change, Lanzhou University, Lanzhou, China
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Xingmin Meng
1Key Laboratory of Western China’s Environmental Systems, Ministry of Education, Lanzhou, China
2Research School of Arid Environment and Climate Change, Lanzhou University, Lanzhou, China
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • For correspondence: [email protected]
Long Tan
1Key Laboratory of Western China’s Environmental Systems, Ministry of Education, Lanzhou, China
2Research School of Arid Environment and Climate Change, Lanzhou University, Lanzhou, China
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Fanyu Zhang
3School of Civil Engineering and Mechanics, Lanzhou University, Lanzhou, China
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Liang Qiao
1Key Laboratory of Western China’s Environmental Systems, Ministry of Education, Lanzhou, China
2Research School of Arid Environment and Climate Change, Lanzhou University, Lanzhou, China
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site

Citation Manager Formats

  • BibTeX
  • Bookends
  • EasyBib
  • EndNote (tagged)
  • EndNote 8 (xml)
  • Medlars
  • Mendeley
  • Papers
  • RefWorks Tagged
  • Ref Manager
  • RIS
  • Zotero
Permissions
View PDF
Share

Comparison and combination of different models for optimal landslide susceptibility zonation

Guan Chen, Xingmin Meng, Long Tan, Fanyu Zhang and Liang Qiao
Quarterly Journal of Engineering Geology and Hydrogeology, 47, 283-306, 20 October 2014, https://doi.org/10.1144/qjegh2013-071
del.icio.us logo Digg logo Reddit logo Twitter logo CiteULike logo Facebook logo Google logo Mendeley logo
Email to

Thank you for sharing this Quarterly Journal of Engineering Geology and Hydrogeology article.

NOTE: We request your email address only to inform the recipient that it was you who recommended this article, and that it is not junk mail. We do not retain these email addresses.

Enter multiple addresses on separate lines or separate them with commas.
Comparison and combination of different models for optimal landslide susceptibility zonation
(Your Name) has forwarded a page to you from Quarterly Journal of Engineering Geology and Hydrogeology
(Your Name) thought you would be interested in this article in Quarterly Journal of Engineering Geology and Hydrogeology.
CAPTCHA
This question is for testing whether or not you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.
Print
Download PPT
Bookmark this article
  • Tweet Widget
  • Facebook Like
  • Google Plus One
  • Article
    • Abstract
    • Study area
    • Materials
    • Method
    • Results and discussion
    • Conclusion
    • Acknowledgments
    • References
  • Figures & Data
  • Info & Metrics
  • PDF

Related Articles

Similar Articles

Cited By...

More in this TOC Section

  • Ground instability detection using PS-InSAR in Lanzhou, China
  • Debris-flow hazard assessment based on stepwise discriminant analysis and extension theory
Show more: Thematic Set Paper: Geohazards of Central China
  • Most read
  • Most cited
Loading
  • Performance of slope stabilization trials on the road network of Laos
  • The temperature of Britain's coalfields
  • The role of engineering geology in delivering the United Nations Sustainable Development Goals
  • Mapping the Geology and Topography of the European Seas (European Marine Observation and Data Network, EMODnet)
  • Drilling into mines for heat: geological synthesis of the UK Geoenergy Observatory in Glasgow and implications for mine water heat resources
More...

Quarterly Journal of Engineering Geology and Hydrogeology

  • About the journal
  • Editorial Board
  • Submit a manuscript
  • Author information
  • Supplementary Publications
  • Subscribe
  • Pay per view
  • Copyright & Permissions
  • Activate Online Subscription
  • Feedback
  • Help

Lyell Collection

  • About the Lyell Collection
  • Lyell Collection homepage
  • Collections
  • Open Access Collection
  • Open Access Policy
  • Lyell Collection access help
  • Recommend to your Library
  • Lyell Collection Sponsors
  • MARC records
  • Digital preservation
  • Developing countries
  • Geofacets
  • Manage your account
  • Cookies

The Geological Society

  • About the Society
  • Join the Society
  • Benefits for Members
  • Online Bookshop
  • Publishing policies
  • Awards, Grants & Bursaries
  • Education & Careers
  • Events
  • Geoscientist Online
  • Library & Information Services
  • Policy & Media
  • Society blog
  • Contact the Society

Published by The Geological Society of London, registered charity number 210161

Print ISSN 
1470-9236
Online ISSN 
2041-4803

Copyright © 2022 Geological Society of London