Skip to main content

Main menu

  • Home
    • Journal home
    • Lyell Collection home
    • Geological Society home
  • Content
    • Online First
    • Issue in progress
    • All issues
    • Thematic Collections
    • Supplementary publications
    • Open Access
  • Subscribe
    • GSL fellows
    • Institutions
    • Corporate
    • Other member types
  • Info
    • Authors
    • Librarians
    • Readers
    • GSL Fellows access
    • Other member types access
    • Press office
    • Accessibility
    • Help
    • Metrics
  • Alert sign up
    • eTOC alerts
    • Online First alerts
    • RSS feeds
    • Newsletters
    • GSL blog
  • Submit
  • Geological Society of London Publications
    • Engineering Geology Special Publications
    • Geochemistry: Exploration, Environment, Analysis
    • Journal of Micropalaeontology
    • Journal of the Geological Society
    • Lyell Collection home
    • Memoirs
    • Petroleum Geology Conference Series
    • Petroleum Geoscience
    • Proceedings of the Yorkshire Geological Society
    • Quarterly Journal of Engineering Geology and Hydrogeology
    • Quarterly Journal of the Geological Society
    • Scottish Journal of Geology
    • Special Publications
    • Transactions of the Edinburgh Geological Society
    • Transactions of the Geological Society of Glasgow
    • Transactions of the Geological Society of London

User menu

  • My alerts
  • Log in
  • My Cart

Search

  • Advanced search
Quarterly Journal of Engineering Geology and Hydrogeology
  • Geological Society of London Publications
    • Engineering Geology Special Publications
    • Geochemistry: Exploration, Environment, Analysis
    • Journal of Micropalaeontology
    • Journal of the Geological Society
    • Lyell Collection home
    • Memoirs
    • Petroleum Geology Conference Series
    • Petroleum Geoscience
    • Proceedings of the Yorkshire Geological Society
    • Quarterly Journal of Engineering Geology and Hydrogeology
    • Quarterly Journal of the Geological Society
    • Scottish Journal of Geology
    • Special Publications
    • Transactions of the Edinburgh Geological Society
    • Transactions of the Geological Society of Glasgow
    • Transactions of the Geological Society of London
  • My alerts
  • Log in
  • My Cart
  • Follow gsl on Twitter
  • Visit gsl on Facebook
  • Visit gsl on Youtube
  • Visit gsl on Linkedin
Quarterly Journal of Engineering Geology and Hydrogeology

Advanced search

  • Home
    • Journal home
    • Lyell Collection home
    • Geological Society home
  • Content
    • Online First
    • Issue in progress
    • All issues
    • Thematic Collections
    • Supplementary publications
    • Open Access
  • Subscribe
    • GSL fellows
    • Institutions
    • Corporate
    • Other member types
  • Info
    • Authors
    • Librarians
    • Readers
    • GSL Fellows access
    • Other member types access
    • Press office
    • Accessibility
    • Help
    • Metrics
  • Alert sign up
    • eTOC alerts
    • Online First alerts
    • RSS feeds
    • Newsletters
    • GSL blog
  • Submit

Conceptual modelling for the design of groundwater control systems

View ORCID ProfileMartin Preene
Quarterly Journal of Engineering Geology and Hydrogeology, 14 December 2020, https://doi.org/10.1144/qjegh2020-138
Martin Preene
Preene Groundwater Consulting Limited, , UK
Roles: [Conceptualization (Lead)]
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Search for this author on this site
  • ORCID record for Martin Preene
  • For correspondence: mp@preene.com
PreviousNext
  • Article
  • Figures & Data
  • Info & Metrics
  • PDF
Loading

Abstract

Groundwater control is required to allow excavations and tunnels to be formed in stable and workably dry conditions below groundwater level. Representative and relevant conceptual models are an essential requirement for the successful development of groundwater control schemes. Prior to construction, conceptual models can aid the planning of ground investigations to help select borehole depths, borehole locations and hydrogeological testing methods. During construction the effectiveness of groundwater control techniques will vary with different hydrogeological conditions and the hydraulic conductivity of the strata. A sound conceptual model reduces the risk of designs being developed using inappropriate approaches to groundwater control. Common misconceptions include the assumption of a single aquifer (where multiple aquifers and aquitards exist) and cases where significant transmissive zones (which may act as aquifers) are not identified. Other errors include assuming that groundwater levels reported during site investigations are representative of maximum levels that may occur during construction, or not considering the risk of external impacts caused by groundwater control methods. A suggested framework to produce better models is problem–solution–technology–impacts. This framework can avoid some of the common misconceptions that have resulted in problems during the design and implementation of groundwater control schemes.

Thematic collection: This article is part of the Ground models in engineering geology and hydrogeology collection available at: https://www.lyellcollection.org/cc/Ground-models-in-engineering-geology-and-hydrogeology

  • © 2020 The Author(s). Published by The Geological Society of London. All rights reserved
View Full Text

Please note that if you are logged into the Lyell Collection and attempt to access content that is outside of your subscription entitlement you will be presented with a new login screen. You have the option to pay to view this content if you choose. Please see the relevant links below for further assistance.

INDIVIDUALS

Log in using your username and password

– GSL fellows: log in with your Lyell username and password. (Please check your access entitlements at https://www.geolsoc.org.uk/fellowsaccess)
– Other users: log in with the username and password you created when you registered. Help for other users is at https://www.geolsoc.org.uk/lyellcollection_faqs
Forgot your username or password?

Purchase access

You may purchase access to this article for 24 hours and download the PDF within the access period. This will require you to create an account if you don't already have one. To download the PDF, click the 'Purchased Content' link in the receipt email.

LIBRARY USERS

Log in through your institution

You may be able to gain access using your login credentials for your institution. Contact your library if you do not have a username and password.
If your organization uses OpenAthens, you can log in using your OpenAthens username and password. To check if your institution is supported, please see this list. Contact your library for more details.
If you think you should have access, please contact your librarian or email sales@geolsoc.org.uk

LIBRARIANS

Administer your subscription.

CONTACT US

If you have any questions about the Lyell Collection publications website, please see the access help page or contact sales@geolsoc.org.uk

PreviousNext
Back to top

Current issue

Quarterly Journal of Engineering Geology and Hydrogeology: 54 (1)
  • Table of Contents
  • About the Cover
  • Index by author
Alerts
Sign In to Email Alerts with your Email Address
Citation tools

Conceptual modelling for the design of groundwater control systems

Martin Preene
Quarterly Journal of Engineering Geology and Hydrogeology, 14 December 2020, https://doi.org/10.1144/qjegh2020-138
Martin Preene
Preene Groundwater Consulting Limited, , UK
Roles: [Conceptualization (Lead)]
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • ORCID record for Martin Preene
  • For correspondence: mp@preene.com

Citation Manager Formats

  • BibTeX
  • Bookends
  • EasyBib
  • EndNote (tagged)
  • EndNote 8 (xml)
  • Medlars
  • Mendeley
  • Papers
  • RefWorks Tagged
  • Ref Manager
  • RIS
  • Zotero
Permissions
View PDF
Share

Conceptual modelling for the design of groundwater control systems

Martin Preene
Quarterly Journal of Engineering Geology and Hydrogeology, 14 December 2020, https://doi.org/10.1144/qjegh2020-138
del.icio.us logo Digg logo Reddit logo Twitter logo CiteULike logo Facebook logo Google logo Mendeley logo
Email to

Thank you for sharing this Quarterly Journal of Engineering Geology and Hydrogeology article.

NOTE: We request your email address only to inform the recipient that it was you who recommended this article, and that it is not junk mail. We do not retain these email addresses.

Enter multiple addresses on separate lines or separate them with commas.
Conceptual modelling for the design of groundwater control systems
(Your Name) has forwarded a page to you from Quarterly Journal of Engineering Geology and Hydrogeology
(Your Name) thought you would be interested in this article in Quarterly Journal of Engineering Geology and Hydrogeology.
CAPTCHA
This question is for testing whether or not you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.
Print
Download PPT
  • Tweet Widget
  • Facebook Like
  • Google Plus One
  • Article
    • Abstract
    • Conceptual models relevant to groundwater control
    • Groundwater control technology
    • Ensuring conceptual models are relevant
    • The semi-quantitative role of conceptual models
    • Successful and unsuccessful groundwater control schemes
    • Common problems with conceptual models
    • Single aquifer misconceptions
    • Missed aquifer misconception
    • The unchanging conditions misconception
    • Mis-applied technologies
    • The forgotten impacts misconception
    • A framework for conceptual models for groundwater control
    • Conclusion
    • Author contributions
    • Funding
    • Data availability
    • Notation
    • References
  • Figures & Data
  • Info & Metrics
  • PDF

Related Articles

Similar Articles

Cited By...

More in this TOC Section

  • Getting the basic ground model right in engineering practice
  • Tunnelling, Chalk and turbidity: conceptual model of risk to groundwater public water supplies
Show more: Thematic collection: Ground models in engineering geology and hydrogeology
  • Most read
  • Most cited
Loading
  • The temperature of Britain's coalfields
  • Hydrogeological challenges in a low-carbon economy
  • Coastal processes in the Russian Baltic (eastern Gulf of Finland and Kaliningrad area)
  • Uncertainty assessment applied to marine subsurface datasets
  • Buried (drift-filled) hollows in London – a review of their location and key characteristics
More...

Quarterly Journal of Engineering Geology and Hydrogeology

  • About the journal
  • Editorial Board
  • Submit a manuscript
  • Author information
  • Supplementary Publications
  • Subscribe
  • Pay per view
  • Alerts & RSS
  • Copyright & Permissions
  • Activate Online Subscription
  • Feedback
  • Help

Lyell Collection

  • About the Lyell Collection
  • Lyell Collection homepage
  • Collections
  • Open Access Collection
  • Open Access Policy
  • Lyell Collection access help
  • Recommend to your Library
  • Lyell Collection Sponsors
  • MARC records
  • Digital preservation
  • Developing countries
  • Geofacets
  • Manage your account
  • Cookies

The Geological Society

  • About the Society
  • Join the Society
  • Benefits for Members
  • Online Bookshop
  • Publishing policies
  • Awards, Grants & Bursaries
  • Education & Careers
  • Events
  • Geoscientist Online
  • Library & Information Services
  • Policy & Media
  • Society blog
  • Contact the Society

Published by The Geological Society of London, registered charity number 210161

Print ISSN 
1470-9236
Online ISSN 
2041-4803

Copyright © 2021 Geological Society of London